Nationwide assessment of practice variability in the utilization of hysteropexy at laparoscopic apical suspension for uterine prolapse.

BACKGROUND: Although hysteropexy has been used to preserve the uterus during uterine prolapse surgery for a long time, there is a scarcity of data that describe the nationwide patterns of use of this surgical procedure. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the national-level use and characteristics of hysteropexy at the time of laparoscopic apical suspension surgery for uterine prolapse in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: This cross-sectional study used data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample. The study population included 55,608 patients with a diagnosis of uterine prolapse who underwent laparoscopic apical suspension surgery from 2016 to 2019. Patients who had a hysterectomy were assigned to the hysterectomy group, and those who did not have a hysterectomy were assigned to the hysteropexy group. The main outcome was clinical characteristics associated with hysteropexy, assessed using a multivariable binary logistic regression model. A classification tree was further constructed to assess the use pattern of hysteropexy during laparoscopic apical suspension procedures. The secondary outcome was surgical morbidity, including urinary tract injury, intestinal injury, vascular injury, and hemorrhage. RESULTS: A hysteropexy was performed in 6500 (11.7%) patients. In a multivariable analysis, characteristics associated with increased use of a hysteropexy included (1) patient factors, such as older age, Medicare coverage, private insurance, self-pay, and medical comorbidity; (2) pelvic floor dysfunction factor of complete uterine prolapse; and (3) hospital factors, including medium bed capacity center and location in the Southern United States (all P<.05). Conversely, (1) the patient factor of higher household income; (2) gynecologic factors such as uterine myoma, adenomyosis, and benign ovarian pathology; (3) pelvic floor dysfunction factor with stress urinary incontinence; and (4) hospital factors including Midwest and West United States regions and rural setting center were associated with decreased use of a hysteropexy (all P<.05). A classification tree identified a total of 14 use patterns for hysteropexies during laparoscopic apical suspension procedures. The strongest factor that dictated the use of a hysteropexy was the presence or absence of uterine myomas; the rate of hysteropexy use was decreased to 5.6% if myomas were present in comparison with 15% if there were no myomas (P<.001). Second layer factors were adenomyosis and hospital region. Patients who did not have uterine myomas or adenomyosis and who underwent surgery in the Southern United States had the highest rate of undergoing a hysteropexy (22.6%). Across the 14 use patterns, the percentage rate difference between the highest and lowest uptake patterns was 22.0%. Patients who underwent a hysteropexy were less likely to undergo anteroposterior colporrhaphy, posterior colporrhaphy, and sling procedures (all P<.05). Hysteropexy was associated with a decreased risk for measured surgical morbidity (3.0 vs 5.4 per 1000 procedures; adjusted odds ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.90). CONCLUSION: The results of these current, real-world practice data suggest that hysteropexies are being performed at the time of ambulatory laparoscopic apical suspension surgery for uterine prolapse. There is substantial variability in the application of hysteropexy based on patient, gynecologic, pelvic floor dysfunction, and hospital factors. Developing clinical practice guidelines to address this emerging surgical practice may be of use.

Increasing utilization of intrauterine device insertion at hysteroscopic endometrial evaluation for patients with endometrial hyperplasia.

PURPOSE: To examine the utilization and characteristics related to the use of hysteroscopy at the time of endometrial evaluation for endometrial hyperplasia in the outpatient surgery setting. METHODS: This cross-sectional study queried the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample. The study population was 3218 patients with endometrial hyperplasia who underwent endometrial evaluation from January 2016 to December 2019. Performance and clinical characteristics of hysteroscopic endometrial evaluation were assessed with multivariable binary logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 2654 (82.5%) patients had hysteroscopic endometrial tissue evaluation. Patients with postmenopausal bleeding, heavy menstrual bleeding, and polycystic ovary syndrome were more likely to undergo hysteroscopic endometrial evaluation in multivariable analysis (all, adjusted-P < 0.001). Uterine injury occurred in 4.9 per 1000 hysteroscopic endometrial evaluations; none had uterine injury in the non-hysteroscopy cohort. Among the 2654 patients who had hysteroscopic endometrial evaluation, 106 (4.0%) patients had intrauterine device insertion at surgery, and the utilization increased from 2.9 to 5.8% during the study period (P-trend < 0.001). Younger age, more recent year surgery, and obesity were independently associated with increased utilization of intrauterine device insertion at hysteroscopic endometrial evaluation (all, adjusted-P < 0.05). Among 2023 reproductive-age patients with endometrial hyperplasia, 1666 (82.4%) patients underwent hysteroscopic endometrial evaluation. On multivariable analysis, patients with heavy menstrual bleeding were more likely to have hysteroscopic endometrial evaluation (adjusted-P < 0.05). Intrauterine device insertion increased from 3.7% in 2016 to 8.0% in 2019 (P-trend = 0.007). CONCLUSION: This nationwide analysis suggests that the insertion of intrauterine devices at the time of hysteroscopic endometrial tissue evaluation for endometrial hyperplasia is increasing among reproductive-age population.

Racial and ethnic differences in early death among gynecologic malignancy.

BACKGROUND: Racial and ethnic differences in early death after cancer diagnosis have not been well studied in gynecologic malignancy. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess population-level trends and characteristics of early death among patients with gynecologic malignancy based on race and ethnicity in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: The National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program was queried to examine 461,300 patients with gynecologic malignancies from 2000 to 2020, including uterine (n=242,709), tubo-ovarian (n=119,989), cervical (n=68,768), vulvar (n=22,991), and vaginal (n=6843) cancers. Early death, defined as a mortality event within 2 months of the index cancer diagnosis, was evaluated per race and ethnicity. RESULTS: At the cohort level, early death occurred in 21,569 patients (4.7%), including 10.5%, 5.5%, 2.9%, 2.5%, and 2.4% for tubo-ovarian, vaginal, cervical, uterine, and vulvar cancers, respectively (P<.001). In a race- and ethnicity-specific analysis, non-Hispanic Black patients with tubo-ovarian cancer had the highest early death rate (14.5%). Early death racial and ethnic differences were the largest in tubo-ovarian cancer (6.4% for Asian vs 14.5% for non-Hispanic Black), followed by uterine (1.6% for Asian vs 4.9% for non-Hispanic Black) and cervical (1.8% for Hispanic vs 3.8% to non-Hispanic Black) cancers (all, P<.001). In tubo-ovarian cancer, the early death rate decreased over time by 33% in non-Hispanic Black patients from 17.4% to 11.8% (adjusted odds ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.85) and 23% in non-Hispanic White patients from 12.3% to 9.5% (adjusted odds ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.85), respectively. The early death between-group difference diminished only modestly (12.3% vs 17.4% for 2000-2002 [adjusted odds ratio for non-Hispanic White vs non-Hispanic Black, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.65] and 9.5% vs 11.8% for 2018-2020 [adjusted odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.78]). CONCLUSION: Overall, approximately 5% of patients with gynecologic malignancy died within the first 2 months from cancer diagnosis, and the early death rate exceeded 10% in non-Hispanic Black individuals with tubo-ovarian cancer. Although improving early death rates is encouraging, the difference among racial and ethnic groups remains significant, calling for further evaluation.

Diagnosis Shift in Site of Origin of Tubo-Ovarian Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To assess population-level trends, characteristics, and outcomes of high-grade serous tubo-ovarian carcinoma in the United States. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study queried the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. The study population was 27,811 patients diagnosed with high-grade serous tubo-ovarian carcinoma from 2004 to 2020. The exposure was the primary cancer site (ovary or fallopian tube). Main outcome measures were temporal trends, clinical characteristics, and overall survival associated with primary cancer site assessed in multivariable analysis. RESULTS: The study population comprised 23,967 diagnoses of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma and 3,844 diagnoses of high-grade serous fallopian tubal carcinoma. The proportion of diagnoses of high-grade serous fallopian tubal carcinoma increased from 365 of 7,305 (5.0%) in 2004-2008 to 1,742 of 6,663 (26.1%) in 2017-2020. This increase was independent in a multivariable analysis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] vs 2004-2008, 2.28 [95% CI, 1.98-2.62], 3.27 [95% CI, 2.86-3.74], and 6.65 [95% CI, 5.84-7.57] for 2009-2012, 2013-2016, and 2017-2020, respectively). This increase in high-grade serous fallopian tubal carcinoma was seen across age groups (4.3-5.8% to 22.7-28.3%) and across racial and ethnic groups (4.1-6.0% to 21.9-27.5%) (all P for trend <.001). Among the cases of tumors smaller than 1.5 cm, the increase was particularly high (16.9-67.6%, P for trend <.001). Primary-site tumors in the high-grade serous fallopian tubal carcinoma group were more likely to be smaller than 1.5 cm (aOR 8.26, 95% CI, 7.35-9.28) and unilateral (aOR 7.22, 95% CI, 6.54-7.96) compared with those in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. At the cohort level, the diagnosis shift to high-grade serous fallopian tubal carcinoma was associated with narrowing differences in survival over time between the two malignancy groups: adjusted hazard ratio 0.84 (95% CI, 0.74-0.96), 0.91 (95% CI, 0.82-1.01), 1.01 (95% CI, 0.92-1.12), and 1.12 (95% CI, 0.98-1.29) for 2004-2008, 2009-2012, 2013-2016, and 2017-2020, respectively. CONCLUSION: This population-based assessment suggests that diagnoses of high-grade serous tubo-ovarian carcinoma in the United States have been rapidly shifting from high-grade serous ovarian to fallopian tubal carcinoma in recent years, particularly in cases of smaller, unilateral tumors.

Lymph Node Isolated Tumor Cells in Patients With Endometrial Cancer.

Importance: Isolated tumor cells (ITCs) are the histopathological finding of small clusters of cancer cells no greater than 0.2 mm in diameter in the regional lymph nodes. For endometrial cancer, the prognostic significance of ITCs is uncertain. Objective: To assess clinico-pathological characteristics and oncologic outcomes associated with ITCs in endometrial cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Database included patients with endometrial cancer who had primary hysterectomy and nodal evaluation from 2018 to 2020. Patients with microscopic and macroscopic nodal metastases and distant metastases were excluded. Data were analyzed from June to September 2023. Exposure: Regional nodal status with ITCs (N0[i+] classification) or no nodal metastasis (N0 classification). Main Outcomes and Measures: (1) Clinical and tumor characteristics associated with ITCs, assessed with multivariable binary logistic regression model, and (2) overall survival (OS) associated with ITCs, evaluated by nonproportional hazard analysis with restricted mean survival time at 36 months. Results: A total of 56 527 patients were included, with a median (IQR) age of 64 (57-70) years. The majority had T1a lesion (37 836 [66.9%]) and grade 1 or 2 endometrioid tumors (40 589 [71.8%]). ITCs were seen in 1462 cases (2.6%). In a multivariable analysis, ITCs were associated with higher T classification, larger tumor size, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and malignant peritoneal cytology. Of those tumor factors, LVSI had the largest association with ITCs (7.9% vs 1.4%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.37; 95% CI, 3.87-4.93), followed by T1b classification (5.3% vs 1.3%; aOR, 2.62; 95% CI, 2.30-2.99). At the cohort level, 24-month OS rates were 94.3% (95% CI, 92.4%-95.7%) for the ITC group and 96.1% (95% CI, 95.9%-96.3%) for the node-negative group, and the between-group difference in expected mean OS time at 36 months was 0.35 (SE, 0.19) months, but it was not statistically significant (P = .06). There was a statistically significant difference in OS when the low-risk group (stage IA, grade 1-2 endometrioid tumors with no LVSI) was assessed per nodal status and adjuvant therapy use (P < .001): (1) among the cases treated with surgical therapy alone, 24-month OS rates were 95.9% (95% CI, 89.5%-98.5%) for the ITC group and 98.8% (95% CI, 98.6%-99.0%) for the node-negative group, and the between-group mean OS time difference at 36 months was 0.61 (SE, 0.43) months (P = .16); and (2) among the cases with ITCs, adjuvant therapy (radiotherapy alone, systemic chemotherapy alone, or both) was associated with improved survival compared with no adjuvant therapy (24-month OS rates, 100% vs 95.9%; between-group mean OS time difference at 36 months, 0.95 [SE, 0.43] months; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with surgically staged endometrial cancer, the results of exploratory analysis suggested that presence of ITCs in the regional lymph node may be associated with OS in the low-risk group. While adjuvant therapy was associated with improved OS in the low-risk group with ITCs, careful interpretation is necessary given the favorable outcomes regardless of adjuvant therapy use. This hypothesis-generating observation in patients with low-risk endometrial cancer warrants further investigation, especially with prospective setting.

Low-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer with adnexal only metastasis: Evaluation of de-escalation of adjuvant therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess survival outcomes of stage IA3 endometrial cancer and the association of adjuvant therapy and survival. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was retrospectively queried to examine 594 and 1455 patients with stage IA3 and IIIA1 endometrial cancer, respectively, from 2010-2015. Overall survival (OS) was examined based on adjuvant therapy: multimodal combination chemotherapy and external beam radiotherapy, chemotherapy alone, external beam radiotherapy alone, and none. RESULTS: For stage IA3 disease, 109 (18.4%) patients did not receive adjuvant therapy. The 5-year OS rates for the no adjuvant therapy group and the combination group were 86.3% and 91.4%, respectively (adjusted-hazard ratio [aHR] 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-2.18). This survival association was consistent when compared to chemotherapy alone (5-year OS rates 86.3% vs 86.3%, aHR 1.11, 95%CI 0.67-1.83). The results were similar among those who underwent nodal evaluation (5-year OS rates, 92.6%, 86.6%, and 89.4% for combination therapy, chemotherapy alone, and no adjuvant therapy), including grade 1 lesions (96.2%, 89.4%, and 100%, respectively). In grade 2 lesions, 5-year OR rates was modestly lower for no adjuvant therapy than combination therapy (89.4%, 84.0%, and 82.7% for combination, chemotherapy alone, and no adjuvant therapy, P = 0.03). For stage IIIA1 disease, omission of adjuvant therapy was associated with decreased OS compared to combination therapy (43.2% vs 73.1%, aHR 1.65, 95%CI 1.30-2.11) or chemotherapy alone (43.2% vs 67.1%, aHR 1.62, 95%CI 1.32-1.99). CONCLUSION: The results of this investigation suggest that survival effects of adjuvant therapy differ for stage IA3 and IIIA1 diseases. Patients with stage IA3 disease have overall good prognosis regardless of adjuvant therapy particularly grade 1 lesions, partly supporting the FIGO committee suggestion for adjuvant therapy de-escalation in stage IA3 endometrial cancer.

[Evaluation of Psychological Distress in Obstetric Patients during the Visit Ban in Hospitals in the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: A Prospective, Multicentre, Controlled Study]. / Evaluation der psychischen Belastung geburtshilflicher Patientinnen während des Besuchsverbots der Kliniken im Rahmen der SARS-CoV-2-Pandemie: Eine prospektive, multizentrische, kontrollierte Studie.

INTRODUCTION: Risk factors for postpartum depression include a lack of social support and perceived social isolation. We would like to determine whether the isolation of inpatients on the maternity wards during Covid-19 leads to increased psychological stress. METHODS: This is a multicentre, controlled study of obstetric patients who gave birth during an inpatient stay. Patients were included during the visitation ban (study group) and after the visitation ban (control group). Psychological stress was evaluated with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) during the inpatient stay and six to eight weeks postpartum. RESULTS: A total of 194 women were included, 107 in the study group and 87 in the control group. The overall result of the first EPDS shows a higher score in the study group compared to the control group (7.0 vs. 4.9 points). Primipara show a higher score in the first EPDS compared to multipara (7.28 vs. 4.82). Caesarean section, regardless of isolation, shows a higher score in the first EPDS than vaginal birth (8.42 vs. 5.11). Comparison of vaginal birth shows a higher score only in the study group (5.97 vs. 4.07). CONCLUSION: In the context of Covid-19, women giving birth and new mothers, especially primipara, are exposed to increased psychological stress in the clinics. Caesarean section leads to increased psychological stress.

Concurrent Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Procedures at the Time of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

In this cross-sectional study including 1,722,479 women who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy between January 2016 and December 2019 identified in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample, the prevalence rate of gynecologic diagnoses was 11.3 per 1,000. Among presumed elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the highest performance rate of concurrent gynecologic procedure per gynecologic diagnosis was laparoscopic adnexectomy among patients with benign ovarian tumor (652/1,000 diagnoses), followed by laparoscopic adnexectomy for endometrioma (386/1,000 diagnoses) and cervical conization for cervical carcinoma in situ (304/1,000 diagnoses). The measured surgical morbidity rates for patients who had concurrent gynecologic surgery and those who did not were 2.8 per 1,000 and 1.9 per 1,000, respectively (adjusted odds ratio 1.39, 95% CI 0.75-2.59). These results suggest that minimally invasive gynecologic surgeries are being performed at the time of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the United States.

Temporal trends of failure-to-rescue following perioperative complications in vulvar cancer surgery in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: Failure-to-rescue, defined as mortality following a perioperative complication, is a perioperative quality indicator studied in various surgeries, but not in vulvar cancer surgery. The objective of this study was to assess failure-to-rescue in patients undergoing surgical therapy for vulvar cancer. METHODS: This cross-section study queried the National Inpatient Sample. The study population was 31,077 patients who had surgical therapy for vulvar cancer from 1/2001-9/2015. The main outcomes were (i) perioperative morbidity (29 indicators) and (ii) mortality following a perioperative complication during the index admission for vulvar surgery (failure-to-rescue), assessed with a multivariable binary logistic regression model. RESULTS: The cohort-level median age was 69 years, and 14,337 (46.1%) had medical comorbidity. Perioperative complications were reported in 4736 (15.2%) patients during the hospital admission for vulvar surgery. In multivariable analysis, patient factors including older age, medical comorbidity, and morbid obesity, and treatment factors with prior radiotherapy and radical vulvectomy were associated with perioperative complications (P < 0.05). The number of patients with morbid obesity, higher comorbidity index, and prior radiotherapy increased over time (P-trends < 0.001). Among 4736 patients who developed perioperative complications, 55 patients died during the hospital admission for vulvar surgery (failure-to-rescue rate, 1.2%). In multivariable analysis, cardiac arrest (adjusted-odds ratio [aOR] 27.25), sepsis or systemic inflammatory response syndrome (aOR 11.54), pneumonia (aOR 6.03), shock (aOR 4.37), and respiratory failure (aOR 3.10) were associated with failure-to-rescue (high-risk morbidities). There was an increasing trend of high-risk morbidities from 2.0% to 3.7% over time, but the failure-to-rescue from high-risk morbidities decreased from 9.1% to 2.8% (P-trend < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Vulvar cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment had increased comorbidity over time with an increase in high-risk complications. However, failure-to-rescue rate has decreased significantly.

Contraception and sterilization selection at delivery among pregnant patients with malignancy.

INTRODUCTION: Since malignancy during pregnancy is uncommon, information regarding contraception selection or sterilization at delivery is limited. The objective of this study was to examine the type of long-acting reversible contraception or surgical sterilization procedure chosen by pregnant patients with malignancy at delivery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study queried the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample in the USA. The study population was vaginal and cesarean deliveries in a hospital setting from January 2017 to December 2020. Pregnant patients with breast cancer (n = 1605), leukemia (n = 1190), lymphoma (n = 1120), thyroid cancer (n = 715), cervical cancer (n = 425) and melanoma (n = 400) were compared with 14 265 319 pregnant patients without malignancy. The main outcome measures were utilization of long-acting reversible contraception (subdermal implant or intrauterine device) and performance of permanent surgical sterilization (bilateral tubal ligation or bilateral salpingectomy) during the index hospital admission for delivery, assessed with a multinomial regression model controlling for clinical, pregnancy and delivery characteristics. RESULTS: When compared with pregnant patients without malignancy, pregnant patients with breast cancer were more likely to proceed with bilateral salpingectomy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.30) or intrauterine device (aOR 1.91); none received the subdermal implant. Pregnant patients with leukemia were more likely to choose a subdermal implant (aOR 2.22), whereas those with lymphoma were more likely to proceed with bilateral salpingectomy (aOR 1.93) and bilateral tubal ligation (aOR 1.76). Pregnant patients with thyroid cancer were more likely to proceed with bilateral tubal ligation (aOR 2.21) and none received the subdermal implant. No patients in the cervical cancer group selected long-acting reversible contraception, and they were more likely to proceed with bilateral salpingectomy (aOR 2.08). None in the melanoma group chose long-acting reversible contraception. Among pregnant patients aged <30, the odds of proceeding with bilateral salpingectomy were increased in patients with breast cancer (aOR 3.01), cervical cancer (aOR 2.26) or lymphoma (aOR 2.08). The odds of proceeding with bilateral tubal ligation in pregnant patients aged <30 with melanoma (aOR 5.36) was also increased. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this nationwide assessment in the United States suggest that among pregnant patients with malignancy, the preferred contraceptive option or method of sterilization at time of hospital delivery differs by malignancy type.

Evolving trends in the surgical therapy of patients with endometrial cancer in Germany: analysis of a nationwide registry with special emphasis on perioperative outcomes.

PURPOSE: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological malignancy in women, with increasing incidence in the last decades. Surgical therapy is the mainstay of the initial management. The present study analyzed the evolving trends of surgical therapy in Germany in patients diagnosed with EC recorded in a nationwide registry. METHODS: All patients with the diagnosis of EC undergoing open surgery, laparoscopic surgery, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery between 2007 and 2018 were identified by international classification of diseases (ICD) or specific operational codes (OPS) within the database of the German federal bureau of statistics. RESULTS: A total of 85,204 patients underwent surgical therapy for EC. Beginning with 2013, minimal-invasive surgical therapy was the leading approach for patients with EC. Open surgery was associated with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality (1.3% vs. 0.2%, p < 0.001), of prolonged mechanical ventilation (1.3% vs. 0.2%, p < 0.001), and of prolonged hospital stay (13.7 ± 10.2 days vs. 7.2 ± 5.3 days, p < 0.001) compared to laparoscopic surgery. A total of 1551 (0.04%) patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery were converted to laparotomy. Procedure costs were highest for laparotomy, followed by robotic-assisted laparoscopy and laparoscopy (8286 ± 7533€ vs. 7083 ± 3893€ vs. 6047 ± 3509€, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The present study revealed that minimal-invasive surgery has increasingly become the standard surgical procedure for patients with EC in Germany. Furthermore, minimal-invasive surgery had superior in-hospital outcomes compared to laparotomy. Moreover, the use of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery is increasing, with a comparable in-hospital safety profile to conventional laparoscopy.

Uptake and Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Among US Patients With Less Common Epithelial Ovarian Carcinomas.

Importance: Randomized clinical trials examining the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for advanced ovarian cancer predominantly included patients with high-grade serous carcinomas. The use and outcomes of NACT in less common epithelial carcinomas are understudied. Objective: To investigate the uptake and survival outcomes in treatment with NACT for less common histologic subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study and systematic literature review with meta-analysis was conducted using the National Cancer Database from 2006 to 2017 and the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program from 2006 to 2019. Data analysis was performed from July 2022 to April 2023. The evaluation included patients with stage III to IV ovarian cancer with clear cell, mucinous, or low-grade serous histologic subtypes who received multimodal treatment with surgery and chemotherapy. Exposures: Exposure assignment per the sequence of treatment: primary debulking surgery (PDS) followed by chemotherapy (PDS group) or NACT followed by interval surgery (NACT group). Main Outcomes and Measures: Temporal trends and characteristics of NACT use were assessed using multivariable analysis, and overall survival (OS) was assessed with the inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score. Results: A total of 3880 patients were examined in the National Cancer Database including 1829 women (median age, 56 [IQR, 49-63] years) with clear cell, 1156 women (median age, 53 [IQR, 42-64] years) with low-grade serous, and 895 women (median age, 57 [IQR, 48-66] years) with mucinous carcinomas. NACT use increased in patients with clear cell (from 10.2% to 16.2%, 58.8% relative increase; P < .001 for trend) or low-grade serous (from 7.7% to 14.2%, 84.4% relative increase; P = .007 for trend) carcinoma during the study period. This association remained consistent in multivariable analysis. NACT use also increased, but nonsignificantly, in mucinous carcinomas (from 8.6% to 13.9%, 61.6% relative increase; P = .07 for trend). Across the 3 histologic subtypes, older age and stage IV disease were independently associated with NACT use. In a propensity score-weighted model, the NACT and PDS groups had comparable OS for clear cell (4-year rates, 31.4% vs 37.7%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.12; 95% CI, 0.95-1.33) and mucinous (27.0% vs 26.7%; HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.68-1.19) carcinomas. For patients with low-grade serous carcinoma, NACT was associated with decreased OS compared with PDS (4-year rates, 56.4% vs 81.0%; HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.55-2.90). Increasing NACT use and histologic subtype-specific survival association were also found in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program cohort (n = 1447). A meta-analysis of 4 studies, including the current study, observed similar OS associations for clear cell (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.96-1.34; 2 studies), mucinous (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.71-1.21; 2 studies), and low-grade serous (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.63-2.74; 3 studies) carcinomas. Conclusions and Relevance: Despite the lack of data on outcomes of NACT among patients with less common carcinomas, this study noted that NACT use for advanced disease has gradually increased in the US. Primary chemotherapy for advanced-stage, low-grade serous ovarian cancer may be associated with worse survival compared with PDS.

Increasing trends of cervical conization with lymph node evaluation for fertility-sparing surgery in early cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To examine uptake, characteristics, and survival outcome of less-radical fertility-sparing surgery with cervical conization and lymph node evaluation (Cone-LN) in reproductive age patients with early cervical cancer. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. The study population included 407 patients aged <50 years with stage IA-IB2 (≤4 cm) cervical cancer who received fertility-sparing surgery from 2004 to 2019. The exposure was fertility-sparing surgery type: Cone-LN (n = 196) or trachelectomy with lymph node evaluation (Trach-LN, n = 211). The main co-outcomes were (i) temporal trends of surgery type, assessed with Cochran-Armitage test, and (ii) clinical and tumor characteristics, assessed with multivariable binary logistic regression model. The secondary outcome was overall survival, assessed with inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score. RESULTS: The number of patients receiving Cone-LN increased from 43.5% in 2004-2007 to 58.4% in 2016-2019 (P-trend = 0.005). Patients receiving conization and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy alone increased from 0% to 14.4% (P-trend < 0.001). In a multivariable analysis, patients in the Cone-LN group were more likely to undergo SLN biopsy (aOR 6.04) compared to those in the Trach-LN group whereas those with adenocarcinoma (aOR 0.49) and T1b tumors (aOR for ≤2 cm 0.21, and aOR for 2.1-4.0 cm 0.10) were less likely to receive Cone-LN. In a propensity score-weighted model, the Cone-LN and Trach-LN groups had comparable overall survival (7-year rates, 98.9% vs 97.8%). Similar associations were observed for patients with squamous, adenocarcinoma / adenosquamous, T1a classification, and T1b(≤2 cm) classification. CONCLUSION: The current population-based analysis suggests that the performance of cervical conization with lymph node evaluation, particularly with SLN biopsy, is gradually increasing for early cervical cancer patients desiring future fertility.

Assessment of Gender-Specific COVID-19 Case Fatality Risk per Malignant Neoplasm Type.

Importance: While the characteristics of COVID-19 infection and mortality among patients with a malignant neoplasm have previously been examined, little data are available for gender-specific COVID-19 mortality. Objective: To examine the gender-specific COVID-19 case fatality risks among patients with a malignant neoplasm. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample, patients admitted to the hospital from April to December 2020 with a diagnosis of COVID-19 infection were identified by the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision code U07.1. Data analysis was performed from November 2022 to January 2023. Exposure: Diagnosis of malignant neoplasm, identified and classified according to the National Cancer Institute's definition. Main Outcome and Measure: COVID-19 in-hospital case fatality rate, defined as the number of deaths that occurred during index hospital admissions. Results: There were 1 622 755 patients who were admitted to the hospital from April 1 to December 31, 2020, with a diagnosis of COVID-19. The cohort-level COVID-19 in-hospital case fatality rate was 12.9% with a median time to death of 5 days (IQR, 2-11 days). Frequently reported morbidities among the patients with COVID-19 included pneumonia (74.3%), respiratory failure (52.9%), cardiac arrythmia or cardiac arrest (29.3%), acute kidney injury (28.0%), sepsis (24.6%), shock (8.6%), cerebrovascular accident (5.2%), and venous thromboembolism or pulmonary embolism (5.0%). In a multivariable analysis, gender (male vs female, 14.5% vs 11.2%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.28; 95% CI, 1.27-1.30) and malignant neoplasm (17.9% vs 12.7%; aOR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.27-1.32) were both associated with increased COVID-19 in-hospital case fatality risk at the cohort level. Among the group of female patients, there were 5 malignant neoplasms in which the COVID-19 in-hospital case fatality risk was greater than 2-fold higher. These included anal cancer (23.8%; aOR, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.84-4.69), Hodgkin lymphoma (19.5%; aOR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.90-4.08), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (22.4%; aOR, 2.23; 95% CI, 2.02-2.47), lung cancer (24.3%; aOR, 2.21; 95% CI, 2.03-2.39), and ovarian cancer (19.4%; aOR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.79-2.59). Among the group of male patients, Kaposi sarcoma (33.3%; aOR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.18-3.66) and malignant neoplasm in the small intestine (28.6%; aOR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.18-3.53) had a greater than 2-fold increased COVID-19 in-hospital case mortality risk. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cohort study confirmed the substantial case fatality rate among patients with COVID-19 in the early pandemic experience in 2020 in the US. While COVID-19 in-hospital case fatality risks were lower among women compared with men, the associations of a concurrent malignant neoplasm with the COVID-19 case fatality were overall more substantial for women than for men.

Treatment and survival of patients with malignant ovarian sex cord-stromal cell tumours: An analysis of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) study group CORSETT database.

BACKGROUND: Malignant sex cord-stromal cell tumours (SCST) account for only 7% of ovarian malignancies. The Arbeitsgemeinschaft fuer Gynaekologische Onkologie (AGO) study group has established a clinicopathological database to provide an overview of the current treatment strategies and survival of SCST patients and to identify research needs. METHODS: Twenty centres provided mixed retro- and prospective data of patients with tumour specimens and second-opinion pathology review treated between 2000 and 2014. Descriptive analyses of treatment strategies, Kaplan-Meier curves and cox regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-two SCST patients were included. One hundred and ninety-one Granulosa-cell tumour (GCT) and 17 Sertoli-Leydig cell tumour (SLCT) patients were stage I disease (>80%). Forty four GCT (18.7%) and two (8.3%) SLCT patients received adjuvant systemic treatment. After a median observation time of 78.2 months, 46% of all SCST patients experienced disease recurrence, treated predominantly with secondary debulking surgery (> 90%). Advanced FIGO stage, lymph node involvement and intra-operative capsule rupture were associated with disease recurrence on univariate analysis (all p < 0.05). Median OS time was not reached. DISCUSSION: In this analysis of SCST patients, adjuvant chemotherapy was unable to prevent disease recurrence. Despite high recurrence rates, overall survival rates were excellent.

Uptake of postplacental intrauterine device placement at cesarean delivery.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have investigated the effectiveness of intrauterine device placement at cesarean delivery as a contraceptive method. However, national-level use and outcomes of a postplacental intrauterine device at cesarean delivery are currently understudied in the United States. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the trends, characteristics, and outcomes of patients who received a postplacental intrauterine device at cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study used the National Inpatient Sample. The study cohort included patients who underwent cesarean delivery from October 2015 to December 2018. The exclusion criteria included hemorrhage, chorioamnionitis, uterine anomaly, hysterectomy, and permanent surgical sterilization. Eligible cases were grouped on the basis of the use of a postplacental intrauterine device at cesarean delivery. The primary outcome measures were temporal trends and characteristics associated with the use of a postplacental intrauterine device at cesarean delivery, assessed using the generalized estimating equation model in multivariable analysis. The secondary outcome measure was perioperative morbidity (leukocytosis, endometritis, myometritis, and sepsis). Propensity score matching was used to balance the baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Among 2,983,978 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 10,145 patients (0.3%) received a postplacental intrauterine device at cesarean delivery. The use of a postplacental intrauterine device increased from 0.1% in the fourth quarter of 2015 to 0.6% in the fourth quarter of 2018 (P<.001). In a multivariable analysis, the use of a postplacental intrauterine device increased by 14% every quarter-year (adjusted odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.15). In addition, (1) patient characteristics of young age, non-White race, obesity, tobacco use, lowest quartile median household income, and insured with Medicaid; (2) hospital characteristics of large bed capacity and urban teaching setting in Northeast region; and (3) pregnancy characteristics of early gestational age at cesarean delivery, hypertensive disease, previous cesarean delivery, multifetal pregnancy, grand multiparity, placenta previa, and nonelective cesarean delivery represented the independent characteristics associated with the use of a postplacental intrauterine device (all P<.05). A regression tree model identified 35 discrete patterns of the use of a postplacental intrauterine device based on 8 factors (time, race or ethnicity, primary expected payer, obesity, hospital bed capacity, hospital teaching status, hospital region, and previous cesarean delivery). There were 9 patterns, representing 8.8% of the study population, exhibiting a use rate of ≥1.0%, whereas there were 7 patterns, representing 16.0% of the study population, exhibiting no use of a postplacental intrauterine device (absolute rate difference from the highest group to the lowest group, 4.7%). In a propensity score-matched model, postplacental intrauterine device placement at cesarean delivery was not associated with increased risk of measured morbidity (any, 1.8% vs 1.7%; odds ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.69; P=.812), including postpartum endometritis (1.2% vs 1.0%; odds ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-2.14; P=.554). CONCLUSION: The use of a postplacental intrauterine device at cesarean delivery increased significantly in recent years in the United States.